Overview speeds and methods
Alex Kiernan
alexk at demon.net
Tue Aug 13 08:35:47 UTC 2002
Katsuhiro Kondou <Katsuhiro_Kondou at isc.org> writes:
> In article <E17eQzW-0007fQ-00 at batzmaru.gol.ad.jp>,
> Christian Balzer <chibi at gol.com> wrote;
>
> } 1. Which is considered the overall fastest overview method? (I read that
> } classic is best for readers)
>
> It depends on your enviroment. How many articles are you fed? How
> many simultaneous readers do you have? I've noted many times on the
> list that the reason why I wrote buffindexed is that tradindexed was
> too slow to handle fullfeed on my test environment(signle disk :).
> ovdb is said to be fast but I've never compared to both on the same
> environment. I was quite happy with my own implementation at my
> previous job, while others often reported on the list that buffer is
> corrupted.
>
Any chance you could write a few words on how ovdb works, so that
someone else could go in and try to find the problem?
--
Alex Kiernan, Principal Engineer, Development, THUS plc
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list