NS record for the @ entry
Mark_Andrews at isc.org
Mark_Andrews at isc.org
Fri Aug 20 02:47:11 UTC 1999
> Does anyone know why there must be a NS record for the @ entry ?
> As my understanding, the NS record is pointing to the local machine
> and it is the local machine the SOA for this zone, so why is the NS
> record still necessary for the @ entry ???
Because that is the definition of a zone. All zones contain
a SOA record and a NS RRset at the top of a zone. NS records
in parent zones are supposed to be *copies* of the child zones
NS records.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
More information about the bind-users
mailing list