PRACTICAL DNS QUESTION
Barry Margolin
barmar at bbnplanet.com
Wed Aug 25 14:39:08 UTC 1999
In article <19990824074450.7152.qmail at hotmail.com>,
Matt Kaz <mk71 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>This is a question on sthg I do not understand.
>I have just setup my own DNS on a linux 6.0 using named. Locally it works
>fine. No error
>messages and nslookup tests at least.
>
>I would like to know what is the next. I figured I should register my DNS
>host with
>networksolutions? And then I will be able to define myself as primary and
>secondary DNS? (I have
>2 ips setup)
Correct.
>I am waiting 4rth day today, and I am not sure if it is going to work. I do
>not understand why
>would network solutions want a domain name for a DNS server (as opposed to
>only ip).
Because delegation records in DNS point to hostnames. You then look up the
address of that host.
>Please let me know if registering a host with networksolutions.com with
>existing ip, running
>named is enough to get a DNS going. I gave a domain name that I had which
>was not served by any
>DNS.
It should be. Just follow all the directions on their web page and you
should be fine.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar at bbnplanet.com
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list