possible problem w/ 8.2.1
Martin, Kevin
kevinm at crt.com
Tue Jun 29 15:37:42 UTC 1999
I noticed that the 8.1 version of dig doesn't do that as well whereas the
8.1 version of nslookup DOES append the suffixes. It appears that the 8.2
version of nslookup does the same thing as the 8.1 and 8.2 versions of dig.
Anyway, here's the info on "dig @dns1 host.nc.il.nb.com" (using dig8.2):
../dig/dig @dns1 host.nc.il.nb.com
; <<>> DiG 8.2 <<>> @dns1 host.nc.il.nb.com
; (1 server found)
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 6
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; host.nc.il.nb.com, type = A, class = IN
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
il.nb.com. 2H IN SOA dns1.il.nb.com.
dnsmaster.dns1.il.nb.com. (
1999062902 ; serial
1H ; refresh
15M ; retry
1W ; expiry
2H ) ; minimum
;; Total query time: 16 msec
;; FROM: dns1 to SERVER: dns1 10.216.34.4
;; WHEN: Tue Jun 29 10:34:29 1999
;; MSG SIZE sent: 42 rcvd: 105
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Margolin [mailto:barmar at bbnplanet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 10:14 AM
To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.uu.net
Subject: Re: possible problem w/ 8.2.1
In article
<F931488C3634D11180D700A02461E245016C63C4 at chitmd03.nt.il.nbgfn.com>,
Martin, Kevin <kevinm at crt.com> wrote:
> Here's the response from V 8.2 dig of host.nc
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+
>+++++++
>
>./dig/dig @dns1 host.nc
Since "dig" doesn't append the suffixes listed in the "search" directive,
you have to do it yourself to test. What does "dig @dns1
host.nc.il.nb.com" return?
--
Barry Margolin, barmar at bbnplanet.com
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the
group.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list