Lawrence Chan webmaster at
Sat Nov 6 05:55:46 UTC 1999

Noted and thanks.

Lawrence Chan
lchan at

Barry Margolin wrote:

> In article <3823941D.8894956F at>,
> Lawrence Chan <webmaster at> wrote:
> >With current BIND setting, one can config the name servers under one's
> >administration to restrict zone transfer update to designated secondary
> >servers.  Are there ways to ensure that those secondaries (most likely
> >under different LAN admin policies) also would oblige with the same
> >restriction?  If not, and short of running both primary and secondaries
> >on the same LAN, one could easily try for zone transfer from the
> >secondaries eventhough restricted from the primary, would it not?
> You're correct.  Transfer limitations are not passed along.
> --
> Barry Margolin, barmar at
> GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
> *** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
> Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.

More information about the bind-users mailing list