slave

Jin Cui JinCui at FairIsaac.com
Thu Sep 16 00:21:54 UTC 1999


So we don't need master db.local for slave in this new BIND?

Jin
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Margolin [mailto:barmar at bbnplanet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 5:15 PM
To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.uu.net
Subject: Re: slave


In article <19990916000616.B3598 at col7.metta.lk>,  <bind at col7.metta.lk>
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I would like to set up my DNS server metta.lk 
>as a secondary DNS for my ISP tradenetsl.lk
>
>I have put a zone file for tradenetsl.lk in my 
>
>/etc/named.conf
>---------------
>zone "tradenetsl.lk"{
>        type slave;
>        file "sec/tradenetsl.lk";
>        masters{
>                204.143.107.34;
>        };
>};
>---------------
>
>The server draws the zone detail into a file in 
>/var/named/sec/tradenetsl.lk
>
>Forgive me for the perhaps stupid question.
>
>Is that all _I_ have to do on _my_ machine 
>for my server to be a Secondary DNS for them ?

Yes.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at bbnplanet.com
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the
group.


More information about the bind-users mailing list