RFC naming question
Joseph S D Yao
jsdy at cospo.osis.gov
Mon Apr 10 22:08:53 UTC 2000
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 02:15:00PM -0600, Henri J. Schlereth wrote:
> While I understand that there is a set of non-publishable reserved
> IP addresses (I use them) but is there an equvalent naming convention
> such as .lan .wan or whatever? If so is there info on this.
>
> TIA
> Henri
Answer to a previous question:
> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:18:40 -0500
> From: Joseph S D Yao <jsdy at cospo.osis.gov>
> To: John Devitofranceschi <jdevitofrances at home.net>
> Cc: comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Private DNS Domains
>
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 11:01:30PM +0000, John Devitofranceschi wrote:
> > A colleague of mine and I were talking about our internal/external
> > (split) DNS setup. We came around to discussing the possibility
> > of 'formally recognized' (by RFC) private domains, like the private
> > networks defined by RFC 1918.
> >
> > Has this idea been discussed? It seems like a neat way to avoid
> > needing to implement an internal 'fake root' zone. You could simply
> > have DOMAIN.com be your external name and DOMAIN.pvt (pvt
> > or prv, for private) internally. Some minimal extra smarts in bind to
> > deal securely with private domains and off you go!
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > jd
>
> RFC 2606
> .test
> .example
> .invalid
> .localhost
> draft-ietf-dnsind-local-names-07.txt
> .local
>
> --
> Joe Yao jsdy at cospo.osis.gov - Joseph S. D. Yao
> COSPO/OSIS Computer Support EMT-B
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is not an official statement of COSPO policies.
--
Joe Yao jsdy at cospo.osis.gov - Joseph S. D. Yao
COSPO/OSIS Computer Support EMT-B
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is not an official statement of COSPO policies.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list