Sortlist...again

Anne LE DUIGOU anne.le-duigou at voila.fr
Thu Dec 28 09:44:04 UTC 2000


yes the server is authoritative, and it's the only one for the zone. By 
checking the named.log, all the request made by the client are logged, 
and the problem is for one client only....

Thanks for your help,
Anne


>
>Is the server in question authoritative for the zone containing the 
name
>being queried=3F Is it the *only* server authoritative for that zone=3F =
If 
not,
>then maybe the client is getting an answer from some other 
authoritative
>server which doesn't have the same sortlist defined.
>
>
>- Kevin
>
>Anne LE DUIGOU wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am new to this mailing-list, I've read this archive and seen a lot 
of
>> questions related to the sortlist option but none seems to answer 
mine.
>>
>> I've configure sortlist statement:
>>         sortlist {
>>                         { 1.1.1.1;
>>                                 { 2.2.2.69/32;};
>>                         };
>>                         { localhost;
>>
>>                                 {2.2.2.5/32; } ;
>>                         };
>>                         {1.1.2.1;
>>                                 { 2.2.2.7/32;};
>>                         };
>>         };
>>
>> For localhost and 1.1.2.1 source the result is correct but not for 
the
>> third one (I mean roun-robin apply and not sorting).
>> You need aditionnal information:
>> the server is BIND8.2.2P7
>> localhost and 1.1.2.1 are SUN Netra with Solaris2.6
>> 1.1.1.1 is a proprietary device with a resolver and implementing
>> BIND4.9.7 for Cache-Only-Server, but TTL set to null in the record
>> desactivate it (and so its round-robin function).
>>
>> I have checked with an analyser that this is the server that doesn't
>> return the correct result (because it could be the client that 
reorder
>> the answer)
>>
>> The only difference in the requests (between 1.1.2.1 and 1.1.1.1
>> sources) are the source port (my device 1.1.1.1 is using the 53 port 
as
>> source port) and the Recursion Desired bit, for my device it is not 
set.
>>  Is it possible that one of these difference may cause problem to the

>> server in order to perform the explicit sorting=3D3F
>>
>> Thank in advance for your answers,
>> Anne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



More information about the bind-users mailing list