Stealth dns and SOA record

[Nicholas Lee]

"Barry Margolin" <barmar at bbnplanet.com> wrote in message
news:V35m4.99$xI3.1025 at burlma1-snr2...

> Unless you're doing Dynamic DNS Updating, nothing cares about the
> nameserver in the SOA record.  If you are, it should be the unpublished
> primary, since that's where you want dynamic updates sent, right?


Furthermore, would I be correct in say that NOTIFYs wont work if the
published primary is in the SOA entry and the other published secondaries
slave off it.

So the unpublished primary wont ever decide to send NOTIFY messages out.

Nicholas