authoritative: use other than for zone xfer?
Barry Margolin
barmar at genuity.net
Tue Jun 27 15:08:13 UTC 2000
In article <200006270249.MAA05917 at bsdi.dv.isc.org>,
<Mark.Andrews at nominum.com> wrote:
>
>> Len Conrad wrote:
>>
>> > Other than enabling/disabling zone transfers, what other
>> > advantage/disadvantage is there to an NS being authoritative or not?
>> >
>> > eg, who/what else cares if an authoritative NS is answering with correct
>> > data but non-authoritatively?
>
> Namservers. If aa is not set they will reject answers as being
> possibly in error.
Do they really reject non-authoritative answers? I thought they just
logged "Lame server" but used the answer anyway.
I think what BIND may do is reduce the credibility of the answer and
accelerate TTL expiration (like it does for records that come from the
Additional Records section of a response).
I think sendmail makes use of the AA flag, though. Before querying
specifically for MX and A records, it sends an ANY query so it can try to
get them both in one shot. If the answer is authoritative and contains
A records but no MX records, it knows that it's complete and it doesn't
need to ask specifically for MX records. A non-authoritative answer that
contained just A records could be due to the fact that the local server
simply doesn't have the MX records in its cache yet.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
Genuity, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list