in.named not recognizing new build of bind

[David Schlussel]

thanks, that's the answer

-david

On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Peter Ziemann wrote:

> David,
> 
> BIND will typically install itself in /usr/local/sbin. The file name is
> "named" and not
> "in.named" which seems to be part of the Solaris7 distribution.
> 
> Therefore just to test, kill the in.named process and run named from the
> directory
> /usr/local/sbin. Please be aware that named.conf is required to be in
> /usr/local/etc
> instead of /etc (or you start it with the -f /etc/named.conf option).
> 
> Ones you have successfully performed that task you have to modify the
> start-up
> files in /etc/rc*.d/*. It is the best to grep for in.named and change the
> lines to
> /usr/local/sbin/named.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Peter Ziemann, hostmaster at pziemann.de
> 
> David Schlussel <dschluss at slip.net> wrote in message
> news:Pine.GSO.3.96.1000301150350.26160E-100000 at slip-3.slip.net...
> >
> > I've successfully built bind.8.2.2 on solaris7, all the makes ran without
> > error, but when I run /usr/sbin/in.named, my /var/adm/messages pops out
> >
> > named[456]: starting.  in.named BIND 8.1.2 Tue Nov 10 18:16:24 PST 1998
> >
> > how do i get named to recognize the new bind?  do i have to rebuild that?
> >
> > -David
> >
> >      _.'`._.'`._.'`._.'`._.'`._.'`._.'`._.'`._
> >    .'                                         `.
> >    |   David - http://www.slip.net/~dschluss   |
> >    `._    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _.'
> >       `..' `..' `..' `..' `..' `..' `..' `..'
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-David

     _.'`._.'`._.'`._.'`._.'`._.'`._.'`._.'`._
   .'                                         `.
   |   David - http://www.slip.net/~dschluss   |
   `._    _    _    _    _    _    _    _    _.'
      `..' `..' `..' `..' `..' `..' `..' `..'