8.2.3 stability

[Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven]

-On [20000519 20:00], Stephen Carville (carville at ugsolutions.com) wrote:
>I know that 8.2.3 is still considered beta code and not recommended fro
>production, but how stable is it really? My experience has been that an ISC
>beta is usually better than most companies' release to manufacturing. The
>upgrade appears to be necessary to implement Active Directory.
>
>If it matters, our master server is running on HPUX 10.20.  We have slaves
>running on Linux (RH 6.0 or 6.1), HPUX 10.20, and Digital UNIX. 

I use some 8.2.3 code in our 8.2.2-p5 servers and thus far no problems.
FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE hosts.

I think it is pretty safe to use the T5B version.  I think most bugs
have been fixed.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          Network- and systemadministrator
<jruigrok at via-net-works.nl>            VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best  http://www.via-net-works.nl
E pluribus unum...