OT Address Munging (was Re: Another rude user using a bad return address)
James A Griffin
agriffin at cpcug.org
Sat Apr 28 15:24:07 UTC 2001
Jim Reid has the right approach IMO. I encourage you to follow his
advice.
However, if you feel you must falsify your address, here is a FAQ on
Address Munging that may be of some interest:
http://members.aol.com/emailfaq/mungfaq.html
This FAQ is intended to be a concise discourse
on "spam-blocking". Otherwise known as "munging",
or breaking one's email address, this is usually
done when posting to Usenet, for the purposes of
avoiding junk email. It is very important to
"mung" in ways that minimize possible damage to
third parties.
But, as Jim Reid suggests, it is better to filter. Here are some How-To
resources:
1. http://junk-mail.com/ offers "How to set up popular email programs
to filter out junk mail"
2. http://digital.net/~gandalf/spamfaq.html is kept current "Figuring
out fake E-Mail & Posts". Rev 20010410 and is very detailed.
Regards,
Jim Griffin
Jim Reid wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Kerry" == Kerry Liles <kerryliles at home.com> writes:
>
> Kerry> AND a lot of spam too... Deliberately bad return addresses
> Kerry> are often used to attempt to foil email harvesting
> Kerry> mechanisms.
>
> These are completely pointless and futile. Hiding email addresses
> behind nospam crap in the headers does not prevent spam. The better
> (worse?) harvesting tools know how to remove them. If you want to
> prevent spam, configure your mail server to use the MAPS
> blacklists. This will stop your mail system accepting mail from known
> spam sources. It doesn't eliminate spam -- nothing can -- but the
> applying the MAPS blacklist checks will dramatically reduce the amount
> you get.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list