BIND 4 is more common than BIND 9
Mark.Andrews at nominum.com
Mark.Andrews at nominum.com
Thu Aug 9 22:32:13 UTC 2001
>
> MK> The reason BIND 4 is more common than BIND 9 (and would you please
> MK> show some numbers to support that claim? Off your web site,
> MK> preferably) [...]
>
> Why would you prefer data published on Dan's web site ? Is the rest of the
> World Wide Web not good enough in some way ? What way ?
>
> According to Bill Manning's web page at
> <URL:http://www.isi.edu./~bmanning/in-addr-versions.html>, BIND version 4
> accounted for 17% of the "in-addr.arpa." content DNS servers in the 2nd
> quarter of 2000, and BIND version 9 accounted for 0%.
Hardly suprising give BIND 9.1.0 was the first BIND 9 release
recommend for production. BIND 9.0.x was advertised as
experimental.
revision 1.18.4.3
date: 2001/01/17 18:57:08; author: gson; state: Exp; lines: +3 -3
bumped to 9.1.0
>
> Bill says that he has survey data for 2001. He hasn't published it, though.
> I, and (I suspect) many others, would be interested in seeing it.
>
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews at nominum.com
More information about the bind-users
mailing list