9.2.0 release date?

Michael Kjorling michael at kjorling.com
Tue Aug 28 20:03:24 UTC 2001


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I usually try to avoid "me too" posts but this one is going to slick
through anyway. I am running my master server with BIND 9.2.0rc1 and
the one slave which is under my actual control is still holding on to
BIND 9.1.2 and have had no problems with this setup so far. I didn't
upgrade from 9.1.3 when 9.2.0rc1 was released, but very soon
afterwards.

It seems to be stable enough for production use by now. But of course
I only do basic DNS and don't play with the really neat features like
Dynamic Update and such. I do use TSIG to some extent, though. If only
Microsoft would support it in their software... (one of my slaves is
an NT box.)


Michael Kjörling


On Aug 28 2001 12:49 -0700, Will Yardley wrote:

> I've been using 9.2 since early betas in a medium sized production
> environment (not on the master server, but on two slaves).  I'd say that
> 9.2rc1 should be pretty stable for most applications at this point.  Any
> bugs at this point are most likely going to be small ones.
>
> w

- -- 
Michael Kjörling - michael at kjorling.com - PGP: 8A70E33E
Manager Wolf.COM -- Programmer -- Network Administrator
"We must be the change we wish to see" (Mahatma Gandhi)

^..^     Support the wolves in Norway -- go to     ^..^
 \/   http://home.no.net/ulvelist/protest_int.htm   \/

***** Please only send me emails which concern me *****

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For my PGP key: http://michael.kjorling.com/contact/pgp.html

iD8DBQE7i/kQKqN7/Ypw4z4RAtuoAKC6zkm2mX0PNT8jzd5rfky1YJJmkACeIfdo
eO+EN/8lqZ4CCGcmH2FaeUA=
=q3J1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the bind-users mailing list