Allow Multiple-Cnames in BIND 9

[Marc Thach Xuan Ky]

Micheal,
I guess the answer to that is "not at all", at least not for the domains
concerned, but then AFAIK that particular facility was not stated as a
requirement by the client that pays the bills.  If I have missed something
(I've just changed my email address) then I'm sorry.
rgds
Marc TXK

Michael Kjorling wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> My question is - how well does this work with DNSSEC?
>
> Michael Kjörling
>
> On Dec 2 2001 22:49 -0000, Marc Thach Xuan Ky wrote:
>
> > Doug,
> > The working model is of course Cisco Distributed Director.  In its later
> > incarnations it allows a specifed number of A records to be returned in a
> > response.  Whether or not this idea is attractive depends on a) money b)
> > learning to live with the rest of DDs little habits.
> > rgds
> > Marc TXK
>
> - --
> Michael Kjörling  --  Programmer/Network administrator  ^..^
> PGP: 95f1 074d 336d f8f0 f297 6a5b 2aa3 7bfd 8a70 e33e   \/
> Internet: michael at kjorling.com -- FidoNet: 2:204/254.4
>
> "There is something to be said about not trying to be glamorous
> and popular and cool. Just be real -- and life will be real."
> (Joyce Sequichie Hifler, September 13 2001, www.hifler.com)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Public key is at http://michael.kjorling.com/contact/pgp.html
>
> iD8DBQE8CrGQKqN7/Ypw4z4RAqmMAJ0QfPcMD6FWBdrQQlkKf1NRlpvLTACeJAFw
> FMocg9h4BAItgph2ndi+AAU=
> =Xgdn
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----