Parsing an AXFR zone transfer into a name record

[Jobe Bittman]

Yes. I don't like the ttls on every line either because I don't want to 
update my perl code for parsing master files. I manned dig but I dont get 
how the +<query-option> works. I can do a pfmin which I assumed was just a 
combination of some of the other query-options. But dig with +Header =no 
doesn't appear to affect the output of my dig.

This is the output im shooting for:
$TTL 86400
$ORIGIN domain.com.
@       IN      SOA             @               hostmaster.dnsserver.net. (
                                 2001113003      ; serial (YYYYMMDDn)
                                 108000          ; refresh
                                 3600            ; retry
                                 604800          ; expire
                                 86400           ; minimum
                         )

                         IN      NS      ns1.tns.net.
                         IN      NS      ns2.tns.net.
                         IN      MX 0    mail.domain.com.
                         IN      MX 10   mail.dnsserver.net.
                         IN      MX 20   mail2.dnsserver.net.
                         IN      A       1.1.1.1
localhost           IN      A       127.0.0.1
www                 IN      CNAME   @
ftp                    IN      CNAME   @
mail              IN    A       1.1.1.1

If my format or times suck, please tell me.

At 11:23 PM 12/3/2001 +0000, Barry Margolin wrote:
>In article <9uh11j$9p2 at pub3.rc.vix.com>, Jobe Bittman  <jobe at tns.net> wrote:
> >Are there any tools out there for turning a domain transfer into a name
> >record? I cobbled together a little perl script to do this, but it only
> >deals with a few records types. I was hoping there was a robust tool out
> >there to do this sort of thing.
>
>The output of "dig axfr" is in the same format as a DB file, so you
>shouldn't need to do much.  The only problem is that it shows the SOA
>record twice (at the beginning and end), so you should remove one of them
>(I'm not sure this is actually *required* -- they should be identical, so
>BIND may allow them both).
>
>--
>Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
>Genuity, Woburn, MA
>*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
>Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the 
>group.