CNAME records having MX

[Michael Kjorling]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Why not? A properly defined MX is just an A RR, and a CNAME should
point to an A RR.

Where is the problem in that?

How you happen to be using the record is nothing BIND really cares
about.


Michael Kjörling


On Dec 14 2001 17:58 -0500, Joseph S D Yao wrote:

> > A CNAME can point to an MX, that is fine.
>
> nope.

- -- 
Michael Kjörling  --  Programmer/Network administrator  ^..^
Internet: michael at kjorling.com -- FidoNet: 2:204/254.4   \/
PGP: 95f1 074d 336d f8f0 f297 6a5b 2aa3 7bfd 8a70 e33e

"There is something to be said about not trying to be glamorous
and popular and cool. Just be real -- and life will be real."
(Joyce Sequichie Hifler, September 13 2001, www.hifler.com)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key is at http://michael.kjorling.com/contact/pgp.html

iD8DBQE8GoWeKqN7/Ypw4z4RAgYSAKC9/QRuN7fSlhTgA0cXcU93VT/49ACeIHHT
3BXHylQw198C6kPTMuGmtr4=
=MUhB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----