CNAME Definition
Erik Aronesty
erik at primedata.org
Mon Feb 5 15:08:32 UTC 2001
Or maybe BIND was right from the very beginning and the RFC's were wrong?
- erik
-----Original Message-----
From: asenec at senechalle.net [SMTP:asenec at senechalle.net]
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 8:43 PM
To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org
Subject: Re: CNAME Definition
Thanks to all who responded. We've apparently
been doing it wrong since time began, but earlier
versions of bind were more forgiving.
Annette
> From bind-users-bounce at isc.org Sat Feb 3 19:30 CST 2001
> To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org
> From: Thor Kottelin <thor at anta.net>
> Subject: Re: CNAME Definition
> Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 00:18:49 +0200
> NNTP-Posting-Host: hpy-1-253.hepunet.fi
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-Accept-Language: sv,fi,en
> X-DCC-MAPS-Metrics: isrv3.isc.org 668; IP=0/1353132 env_From=0/750219
> From=0/7963 Subject=0/3138 Message-ID=0/1427 Received=0/1427
> Body=0/1426 Fuz1=0/1426
> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:bind-users-request at isc.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
> X-List-ID: <bind-users.isc.org>
>
>
>
>
> asenec at senechalle.net wrote:
>
> > myownjunk IN SOA ns.theaccount.com. hostmaster.theaccount.com. (
> > 2001020312 86400 7200 3600000 172800 )
> > IN NS ns.theaccount.com
> > IN NS ns2.theaccount.com
> > IN CNAME asenec.com.
>
> "If a CNAME RR is present at a node, no other data should be present ---"
> - RFC 1034
>
> <URL:http://www.acmebw.com/askmrdns/bind-messages.htm#idx_c> - scroll down
> to "CNAME and other data (invalid)"
>
> <URL:http://www.acmebw.com/askmrdns/00014.htm>,
> <URL:http://www.acmebw.com/askmrdns/00269.htm>
>
> Thor
>
> --
> Plain old email is very insecure. Please make it !gc
> a little safer for yourself and me by using PGP.
> FAQ: <URL:http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/pgp-faq/>.
> My public keys are available from key servers. IRCnet #areena
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list