TTL Question
Kevin Darcy
kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Thu Jan 4 16:32:53 UTC 2001
_DNS_and_BIND_, 3rd Edition, predates BIND 8.2, which adopted the new
RFC 2308 regime. The last field of the SOA record is *no*longer* the "default
TTL". So you have to have some other way of telling named what the default
TTL is.
- Kevin
Jeffrey C. Albro wrote:
> Hmmmm, I look at the docs, and I understand what I'm being told to do, but
> I don't understand why. I thought all the records got their ttl from the
> SOA?
>
> For instance, my SOA of:
>
> @ IN SOA ns1.canbox.com. postmaster.canbox.com. (
> 2001010201 ;serial
> 10800 ; refresh after 3 hours
> 3600 ; retry after 1 hour
> 604800 ; expire after 1 weeks
> 86400) ; min ttl of 1 day
>
> Also gives this error, but it looks just like it does in the DNS and BIND
> book.
>
> Can I buy a clue? : )
>
> -Jeff
>
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:42:00PM +0100, Marco Kammerer wrote:
> > > Can I get the messages No deault TTL .... to disappear? (see below)
> >
> > Why didn't you just took a quick look into the docs? *groan*
> >
> > http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/docs/config_hints.html
> >
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > --
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > entire systems GmbH | droesen at entire-systems.com
> > Internet Services | Phone: +49 2624 9550-55
> > Ferbachstrasse 12 | Fax: +49 2624 9550-20
> > D-56203 Hoehr-Grenzhausen | http://www.entire-systems.com/
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
More information about the bind-users
mailing list