named and in.named

[Brad Knowles]

At 6:25 PM -0700 7/24/01, Tony wrote:

>  Is named and in.named the same?

	Yup.  Solaris just calls theirs by a weird name.

>  I am running solaris 8 and  I dont find named anywhere.
>
>  there is in.named under /usr/sbin
>
>  in.named BIND 8.2.2-P5 Thu Jan  4 20:36:53 PST 2001
>          Generic 109327-02-5.8-February 2000

	You need to upgrade to at least 8.2.3, preferably at least 8.2.4 
because the version you are running leaves you wide open to a root 
compromise.  In fact, I would not at all be surprised if your machine 
was already compromised.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

/*        efdtt.c  Author:  Charles M. Hannum <root at ihack.net>          */
/*       Represented as 1045 digit prime number by Phil Carmody         */
/*     Prime as DNS cname chain by Roy Arends and Walter Belgers        */
/*                                                                      */
/*     Usage is:  cat title-key scrambled.vob | efdtt >clear.vob        */
/*   where title-key = "153 2 8 105 225" or other similar 5-byte key    */

dig decss.friet.org|perl -ne'if(/^x/){s/[x.]//g;print pack(H124,$_)}'