chroot-ed bind 9 (was: Users Want *Seamless* Solutions, Not Patchwork)
Brad Knowles
brad.knowles at skynet.be
Fri Jul 27 20:01:08 UTC 2001
At 10:09 AM -0500 7/27/01, Donald Nash wrote:
> True, but a well-constructed chroot jail makes it easier to clean up the
> mess. In my case, BIND runs in a jail and under a non-root UID which
> neither owns nor has write access to anything in the jail, including the
> zone file themselves*.
You must have a hard time running secondary nameservers that are
never able to write file versions of the zones that they transfer.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>
H4sICIFgXzsCA2RtYS1zaWcAPVHLbsMwDDvXX0H0kkvbfxiwVw8FCmzAzqqj1F4dy7CdBfn7
Kc6wmyGRFEnvvxiWQoCvqI7RSWTcfGXQNqCUAnfIU+AT8OZ/GCNjRVlH0bKpguJkxiITZqes
MxwpSucyDJzXxQEUe/ihgXqJXUXwD9ajB6NHonLmNrUSK9nacHQnH097szO74xFXqtlbT3il
wMsBz5cnfCR5cEmci0Rj9u/jqBbPeES1I4PeFBXPUIT1XDSOuutFXylzrQvGyboWstCoQZyP
dxX4dLx0eauFe1x9puhoi0Ao1omEJo+BZ6XLVNaVpWiKekxN0VK2VMpmAy+Bk7ZV4SO+p1L/
uErNRS/qH2iFU+iNOtbcmVt9N16lfF7tLv9FXNj8AiyNcOi1AQAA
More information about the bind-users
mailing list