(no subject) - win2k

[Adam Lang]

I wouldn't see why not.  for the most part DNS queries and responses are DNS
queries and responses.

In terms of the department wanting to run their own DNS, who makes the
decisions?  If company policy is to run BIND, then tell them to eat it and
if they want their own DNS, they need to use bind.

Hell, it isn't like the zone files are that hard to build where you need a
gui.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Frank" <david at datachannel.com>
To: <comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 5:23 PM
Subject: (no subject)


> One of our departments wants their own sub domain to manage. The problem
is
> that they want to use a Win2k DNS Server for their DNS; we currently use
> bind exclusively. Another issue is that they also have Solaris boxes that
> they want in that same sub-domain.
>
> My question is this; If they run their win2k box as a master of their
> sub-domain and I configure my DNS server (Which is the secondary for our
> domain) as a slave for their sub-domain, will the Solaris boxes be able to
> look to my Unix name server for resolution when Win2k DNS fails?
>
> We are currently running Bind 8.2.4 in Solaris 7 internally.
>
> Thank you for your time,
>
> David
>
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
> David Frank | Network Administrator
>
> w w w . d a t a c h a n n e l . c o m
>
>
>
>