2.4 kernel and bind 8.2.3 - REL.

paul j paul at netpacq.com
Sun Jun 24 16:25:19 UTC 2001


At 12:49 AM 6/24/2001, Willis L. Sarka wrote:
>Well Paul,
>
>I'm running Bind 9.1.0 on RedHat 7.1 with the "NEW" kernel, and seems to
>be working fine.  The general rule of thumb for most OSes I've ever worked
>with is to have swap twice the size of memory.  I'm curious, what do you
>mean that 8.2.3 did not like it at first?  Not having enough swap?


>How big of a zone are you running?

Lets see..... I have over 3,500 names in one of my name servers.

>   How heavily used is this name server?

Very heavily...



>Cheers,
>Will Sarka
>
>On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Paul Jacobs wrote:
>
> >
> > Anyone else finding that the "NEW" linux kernel 2.4 is not all it is said
> > to be...?
> > It seems to be more microsoft like... (needs double swap file now?)
> > 8.2.3 did not like it at first, but calmed down. -:)
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Paul Jacobs /Senior Network Eng.
> > Netpacq Systems Inc.
> > http://www.netpacq.com
> > mailto:paul at netpacq.com
> > Picture : http://netpacq.com/nis_about.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >

Best regards,
Paul Jacobs /Senior Network Eng.
Netpacq Systems Inc.
http://www.netpacq.com
mailto:paul at netpacq.com
Picture : http://netpacq.com/nis_about.htm





More information about the bind-users mailing list