cname quick question
kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Wed Mar 7 22:43:06 UTC 2001
Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 12:01 PM -0700 3/7/01, Cricket Liu wrote:
> > I could bring this up as a possible service the Registry could offer.
> > Are there any technical objections to it that I haven't thought of?
> Well, doing so would certainly break MX records, because BINDv9
> no longer tolerates in any way, shape, or form the pointing of MXes
> at CNAMEs.
This would be, effectively, a CNAME pointed at an MX, not the other way
around. It should work fine.
More information about the bind-users