BIND 8.2.3 verus 9.x.x ?? in production
Nate Duehr
nate at natetech.com
Thu Mar 22 10:02:11 UTC 2001
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 08:43:39PM +0000, Jim Reid wrote:
> >>>>> "Brad" == Brad Knowles <brad.knowles at skynet.be> writes:
>
> >> I agree with Kevin, but it has more to do with the 41,000
> >> queries one of my servers took in 40 seconds last weekend than
> >> anything. :-)
>
> Broken desktops can be a real problem, eh? :-)
>
> Brad> Ahh, but that's only a thousand queries a second. I
> Brad> had machines back in 1996 that could do that many. ;-)
>
> Query rates of 1000+ per second are well up towards root name server
> levels. They shouldn't be seen in regular, well-behaved environments -
> even at huge ISPs.
Let's just say I have a customer with a penchant for reverse lookups he
doesn't need... and leave it at that. 14 web servers doing 40+ Mbs of
traffic can create a lot of in-addr.arpa lookups! The application is
horribly misconfigured, but who am I to explain that to him when "his
last ISP handled it just fine"? :-) Gotta love it.
> >> I also think calling it BIND 9 is a misnomer. It's NIND
> >> 1.1.1rc5, not BIND 9.1.1rc5. (NIND = Nominum Internet Name
> >> Daemon -- Berkeley's not really all that involved anymore, are
> >> they?)
>
> Brad> No, this is not at all correct. BIND is an ISC
> Brad> product, and Nominum's involvement is as the company that
> Brad> has been contracted to write the code. Therefore, this is
> Brad> very much still BINDv9, since this is still an ISC project.
>
> Indeed. That's why all the BIND9 code has the ISC copyright: it's the
> ISC's intellectual property, not Nominum's. Anything we do that we own
> carries a Nominum copyright.
Well, the NIND was just a thought. Obviously an incorrect one. I like
your explanation below better than my rant. :-)
> However the original poster is strictly correct to say the code
> shouldn't be called BIND any more. But it should have been renamed 5-6
> years ago. UC Berkeley's direct involvement with BIND stopped around
> the time the CSRG wound up in 1995. I think that Vixie Enterprises had
> taken over the maintenance of BIND by that time: maybe sooner or a
> little later. Shortly after that the ISC was born and "ownership" of
> BIND was transferred to that not-for-profit institution. The code
> retained UCB's copyright - a good model for open source IMHO - and
> then inherited a bunch of other open source copyrights as a cast of
> thousands contributed code.
--
Nate Duehr <nate at natetech.com>
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list