Proposal: Seperate windows-bind-users list
mayer at gis.net
Mon Mar 26 03:51:25 UTC 2001
This is a bad idea. There is almost no traffic concerning bind on Win32.
There's lots of traffic concerning Win2K systems sending updates to the nameserver.
However, those nameservers are almost invariably running on Solaris or Linux.
The whole goal of the Windows port of BIND is to make it work as much as
possible like the one on Unix. The bind for windows specific traffic in this list is
less than 1%. Why don't you just create a mail filter to dump the windows bind
mail to NULL?
At 05:25 PM 3/25/01, Doug Barton wrote:
> This is simply a suggestion, worth only the paper its printed on since I
>have no way to create or enforce it. However, in my continuing campaign to
>reduce the amount of unwanted e-mail I receive (and thereby give myself a
>fighting chance to read the things that are important to me) it occurred to
>me that it might be of mutual benefit for the isc to create a list specific
>to the needs of those who run bind on windows.
> What do y'all think?
> Perhaps the greatest damage the American system of education has done
> to its children is to teach them that their opinions are relevant
> simply because they are their opinions.
> Do YOU Yahoo!?
More information about the bind-users