newbie on bind -lame server

Boulton, Michael (Corp-Warren) mboulton at bwauto.com
Thu Mar 29 15:49:32 UTC 2001



 Sorry, I missed that. How would you find if you are lamed? In 'Lamens'
terms.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	"Peña, Botp" [SMTP:botp at delmonte-phil.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:49 AM
> To:	comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org
> Subject:	RE: newbie on bind -lame server
> 
> 
> Thanks, James G, James R, Chip, and Jim Reid.
> 
> James G was kind enough to give me a report our state. And yes, we
> ourselves
> are lamed.
> We will fixed this.
> 
> Thank you all for the help.
> 
> -botp
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James Raftery [mailto:james-bind-users at now.ie]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:54 PM
> > To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org
> > Subject: Re: newbie on bind -lame server
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:01:48PM +0800, "Peña, Botp" wrote:
> > > I got a lot of lame server messages (below is a sample).
> > > Do I need to worry?
> > 
> > No - your nameserver is merely logging messages that highlight the
> > abysmal state of the DNS today. Each one of the zones listed (in the
> > "Lame server on "X" portion, where X is the zone) has a nameserver
> > supposed to be hosting it, but isn't.
> > 
> > Get a copy of DoC or dnswalk and run it against your own 
> > domains to make
> > sure your domains are not in a similar state.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > james
> > -- 
> > James Raftery (JBR54)
> >   "It's somewhere in the Red Hat district"  --  A network engineer's
> >    freudian slip when talking about Amsterdam's nightlife at RIPE 38.
> > 


More information about the bind-users mailing list