http://www.new.net/
HAG.Keijzer at mindef.nl
HAG.Keijzer at mindef.nl
Tue May 22 14:12:22 UTC 2001
Standards, it's what you are missing.
People will always however try to make money out of everything, including
this kind of 'crap' (sorry folks, I don't have any other name for it).
Anarchy is nice, but old.
Why bother with RFC's when everybody is gonna do whatever they wanna do
anyways?
shrug
Kind Regards / Met vriendelijke Groet,
Gody Keijzer
ECOLOGICAL MESSAGE: This message is sent over 100% recycled electrons
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pete Peterson [mailto:petersonp at genrad.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 3:09 PM
> To: bind-users at isc.org; aalang at rutgersinsurance.com
> Subject: Re: http://www.new.net/
>
>
>
> > To: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
> > From: Paul Jacobs <paul at netpacq.com>
> > Subject: Re: http://www.new.net/
> > Cc: <bind-users at isc.org>
> >
> >
> > Hmm... sell more websites to people with the names they want.....
> > Drive more traffic to your system thus get your name out there more.
> >
> > Tell the government the internet will allways be free....
> etc.. etc....
> >
> > At 01:01 PM 5/21/2001, Adam Lang wrote:
> >
> > >Ok, this falls into a conversation I was having with
> someone off list.
> > >
> > >For curiosity's sake, what are the reasons for supporting them?
> > >
> > >Adam Lang
> > >Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
>
> I'm missing a concept here somehow. These guys invent their own top
> level domain names and assign me "coles.law" for my food company or
> "spam.med" for my junk E-mail business.
>
> Fifty other people go to fifty other companies doing the same
> thing and each
> gets these same highly desirable names assigned to themselves.
>
> Now Joe Netuser comes along and uses an "xyz.coles.law" URI
> and it seems
> like he has a 2% chance of hitting my site as opposed to one
> of the other
> 49, depending on what bogus root servers managed to pollute his view
> of the Internet namespace in what order.
>
> Is this useful? Isn't uniqueness essential in Internet addresses?
>
> What am I missing here?
>
>
> pete peterson
> GenRad, Inc.
> 7 Technology Park Drive
> Westford, MA 01886-0033
>
> petersonp at genrad.com or rep at genrad.com
> +1-978-589-7478 (GenRad);
> +1-978-589-2088 (Closest FAX); +1-978-589-7007 (Main
> GenRad FAX)
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list