two or more bind/servers on the same machine

Michael Kjorling michael at kjorling.com
Thu May 3 19:00:49 UTC 2001


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I don't know the exact syntax for BIND 8.2.3, but in 9.1.1 you have to
say 'named -c named.conf' and not just 'named named.conf'. Have you
tried that?


Michael Kjörling


On Thu, 3 May 2001, Randall Badilla wrote:

> Hi all:
> I have checked the maillist archive but I still have a dubt.
> The only way to have two or more bind process (each has a named.conf for
> differents zones) is via chroot?
>
> I'm trying to migrate a bind conf from a Sun Netra machine (wich a unknown
> version of bind 8) which Bind script states something like this:
> /usr/sbin/named my.zone.conf &
> /usr/sbin/named my.otherzone.conf &
>
> With this setup there are 2 bind process with (diferent listen-on
> statement, and diferent nics and ip address for each one) running fine
> (has nearly 5 month running).
>
> On the new server which is running bind 8.2.3 I try the same and ndc gave
> errors and the bind only resolvs me for one or the other zone but not all.
>
> I guessing it's a version problem or I'm loosing something.
>
> My search only give me examples using chroot, but I have one running a
> very simple setup without it. Then somebody can enlightme If I can do the
> same with bind 8.2.3 and how, or I have to go with chroot ?
>
> Thanks a lot!

- -- 
Michael Kjörling - michael at kjorling.com - PGP: 8A70E33E
"We must be the change we wish to see" (Mahatma Gandhi)

^..^     Support the wolves in Norway -- go to     ^..^
 \/   http://home.no.net/ulvelist/protest_int.htm   \/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8

iQA/AwUBOvGq4yqje/2KcOM+EQIO1wCfdu6wwsH4LMujJj312TZIWWbObGIAoJ+3
E2d3SiC+W27u0hxYOphuMcXM
=31KG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the bind-users mailing list