reverse name problem with dns server

Kevin Darcy kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Thu May 3 19:50:47 UTC 2001


RFC 1912 is *informational*. It's not even a Best Current Practice, let
alone a standard. RIPE is being way too picky here. But, if you can't
persuade them to relax this requirement, you have to either get another
ISP or persuade your current one to change the reverse entry.


- Kevin

adrian boliston wrote:

> I have got the reverse IP addresses for my network delegated to my own
> nameserver and another nameserver operated by a friend.
>
> Ripe.net is the registry for all my own IP addresses, and their site has
> a tool where you can check that reverse delegation has been correctly
> set up.
>
> The tool found a problem with my friends nameserver, because he has
> given his nameserver a name that is not the same as the reverse name
> corresponding to the IP address of his name server.
>
> The tool says:
>
> WRONG REVERSE MAPPING - For every IP address there should be a matching
> PTR record registered (RFC 1912, section 2.1).
>
> As I have got reverse delegation on my IP block, I have set my reverse
> name the same as my nameservers name.
>
> My friend has *not* got reverse delegation, and has to accept the long,
> complicated reverse name for his single IP address, which he would
> probably not wish to use as the name for his name server, as it is not
> even a domain name he controls, as the ISP has used a reverse name under
> their own domain name.
>
> What are the implications of this error the tool has picked up?
>
> -Adrian Boliston





More information about the bind-users mailing list