Hidden Master

[Barry Margolin]

In article <9s9m1m$qst at pub3.rc.vix.com>,
Chimento, Douglas <Douglas.Chimento at FMR.COM> wrote:
>I assume that the below implementation is ok , meaning that are no critical
>issues.
>unparticular I am concerned with the  SOA record 
>Thanks 

You should put the hidden master's name in the SOA record.  But unless
you're using dynamic updates it doesn't really matter, because nothing
else uses that field.

BTW, as far as I know, *nothing* uses WKS records any more.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
Genuity, Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.