"record has zero TTL" on resolving IN A
Simon at wretched.demon.co.uk
Wed Oct 17 09:25:55 UTC 2001
"René Knudsen" wrote:
> What am I doing wrong ???
> # Place other options here. };
Just a thought but BIND 9 requires the "};" not to be on a
I never use # as a comment in named.conf, but that is probably
Lots of things return IP and TTL 0.
dig +norec @18.104.22.168 . ns
I assume you'll add redundancy when it is all working?
I'd have dropped the "null" logging as well, you never know what
logging will throw up.
More information about the bind-users