is bind needed at all?
Brad Knowles
brad.knowles at skynet.be
Thu Sep 6 16:51:25 UTC 2001
At 9:59 AM -0600 9/6/01, Cricket Liu wrote:
> That's my philosophy. There are enough people out there
> who need help and are willing to post real domain names
> to keep me busy. Of course, as Barry points out, some
> questions are purely theoretical and don't require real
> domain names.
The problem is that, at least the way I read the original post,
there really wasn't enough information there to really determine what
they want/need, and they were obviously trying to hide the real
domain name.
With regard to Pete's answer, I agree that being literal is
generally best, but you obviously need to follow that up with
something like "If you intentionally obscured the real domain name by
using <insert example here>, then obviously this answer may not be
appropriate for you."
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>
H4sICIFgXzsCA2RtYS1zaWcAPVHLbsMwDDvXX0H0kkvbfxiwVw8FCmzAzqqj1F4dy7CdBfn7
Kc6wmyGRFEnvvxiWQoCvqI7RSWTcfGXQNqCUAnfIU+AT8OZ/GCNjRVlH0bKpguJkxiITZqes
MxwpSucyDJzXxQEUe/ihgXqJXUXwD9ajB6NHonLmNrUSK9nacHQnH097szO74xFXqtlbT3il
wMsBz5cnfCR5cEmci0Rj9u/jqBbPeES1I4PeFBXPUIT1XDSOuutFXylzrQvGyboWstCoQZyP
dxX4dLx0eauFe1x9puhoi0Ao1omEJo+BZ6XLVNaVpWiKekxN0VK2VMpmAy+Bk7ZV4SO+p1L/
uErNRS/qH2iFU+iNOtbcmVt9N16lfF7tLv9FXNj8AiyNcOi1AQAA
More information about the bind-users
mailing list