Win2k forgets Nameserver?

Brad Knowles brad.knowles at skynet.be
Mon Sep 24 21:36:20 UTC 2001


At 2:37 PM -0400 9/24/01, Danny Mayer wrote:

>  That's a really bad idea.  You should always have at least 2 nameservers and
>  both be listed in each of the desktops' IP settings. If you lose your single
>  nameserver, because of disk crash, bad hardware, maintenance, etc. you have
>  no name resolution at all.

	Microsoft clients only ever remember the first IP address of the 
first nameserver they are told about, so it's not like it makes any 
difference.  If you want high availability, you have to use a layer 
four load-balancing switch (e.g., Foundry, Alteon, RadWARE, etc...) 
sitting in front of two or more nameservers, and have it distribute 
the load to the multiple back-end machines, etc....  And then you 
need two of these, with one as a hot spare and set to steal the IP 
address if the primary dies.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

H4sICIFgXzsCA2RtYS1zaWcAPVHLbsMwDDvXX0H0kkvbfxiwVw8FCmzAzqqj1F4dy7CdBfn7
Kc6wmyGRFEnvvxiWQoCvqI7RSWTcfGXQNqCUAnfIU+AT8OZ/GCNjRVlH0bKpguJkxiITZqes
MxwpSucyDJzXxQEUe/ihgXqJXUXwD9ajB6NHonLmNrUSK9nacHQnH097szO74xFXqtlbT3il
wMsBz5cnfCR5cEmci0Rj9u/jqBbPeES1I4PeFBXPUIT1XDSOuutFXylzrQvGyboWstCoQZyP
dxX4dLx0eauFe1x9puhoi0Ao1omEJo+BZ6XLVNaVpWiKekxN0VK2VMpmAy+Bk7ZV4SO+p1L/
uErNRS/qH2iFU+iNOtbcmVt9N16lfF7tLv9FXNj8AiyNcOi1AQAA


More information about the bind-users mailing list