W2K multi-master features
Lionel Deruaz
lderuaz at free.fr
Tue Aug 13 07:56:40 UTC 2002
Hello,
Our company is wondering wether or not use Microsoft DNS (a W2K/AD
architecture is going to be implemented soon).
Does W2K multi-master capacity really avoid the 'single point of
failure caused if the primary dns server fails' (and so prevent any
dynamic update) in a primary/secondary dns architecture ?
Or is there any characteristic offering absolute advantages for using
Microsoft DNS ?
We are currently using Bind and Lucent (VitalQIP) DNS servers.
Thanks,
Lionel
More information about the bind-users
mailing list