Optimize BindBIND 9.1.0 for greater "throughput"??
nate at wired.com
Tue Feb 5 22:33:18 UTC 2002
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:59:24PM +0000, phat_phoque at salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote:
> Nate Campi <nate at wired.com> wrote:
> > BIND 9, on the other hand, performs very poorly as a resolver. I've
> > tested it on Solaris and Linux, threaded and not threaded, sun compiler
> > and gcc, sparc and intel on Solaris - and BIND 9 never does well. I
> > usually get around 150 queries/sec for resolution in tests (sometimes
> > much, much worse).
> Interesting. Any quick fixes I can implement to immediately increase my
My bad, I guess I didn't come right out and say it:
Install BIND 8 or dnscache.
Nate Campi Job: hostmaster at lycos.com and root at wired.com
"Kids today have so many advantages I never had. There's no telling what
I could've accomplished with a home computer and a handgun."
- LeMel Hebert-Williams.
More information about the bind-users