Lame server ??
Simon at wretched.demon.co.uk
Fri Feb 22 09:56:27 UTC 2002
Tom Robinson wrote:
> These were not helpful answers for this person.
Sorry, I differ - help yourself, by reading what is already
written on an error would seem a sensible course of action,
especially on one so extensively documented as lame servers
> Suppressing the error will just hide the internal configuration problem.
I personally think suppressing lame server messages is a bad
thing in general. Just because a lot of bad DNS configs exist
doesn't mean you should ignore them, the availablity of a domain
your users are trying to use is usually in peril. And software
doesn't distinguish when ignoring errors if it is one of your
domains or not either.
> Possibly a missing period after "localhost" ?
And where do you think a missing period would cause this error?
Most likely I think they have a stray record like "localhost ns
More information about the bind-users