Max CNAMES rec. with BIND 8?

[Barry Margolin]

In article <a5lt80$ie7 at pub3.rc.vix.com>,
Dominique Frise  <me at nospam.net> wrote:
>Is there a limit in number for CNAMES records pointing to the same
>canonical name under BIND 8.2.1?

I can't imagine why there would be.  BIND doesn't keep track of the reverse
direction of CNAMEs, so why would there be a limit of something that isn't
even recorded?

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
Genuity, Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.