Max CNAMES rec. with BIND 8?
barmar at genuity.net
Thu Feb 28 18:54:07 UTC 2002
In article <a5lt80$ie7 at pub3.rc.vix.com>,
Dominique Frise <me at nospam.net> wrote:
>Is there a limit in number for CNAMES records pointing to the same
>canonical name under BIND 8.2.1?
I can't imagine why there would be. BIND doesn't keep track of the reverse
direction of CNAMEs, so why would there be a limit of something that isn't
Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
Genuity, Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
More information about the bind-users