Max CNAMES rec. with BIND 8?

phn at phn at
Thu Feb 28 19:05:06 UTC 2002

Dominique Frise <me at> wrote:

> Hi,

> Is there a limit in number for CNAMES records pointing to the same
> canonical name under BIND 8.2.1?


However bind-8.2.1 is dangerous. Replace NOW !!!!

> Thanks

Peter Håkanson         
        IPSec  Sverige      (At the Riverside of Gothenburg, home of Volvo)
           Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out.
	   Remove "icke-reklam" and it works.

More information about the bind-users mailing list