dig +trace problems
Will Yardley
&- at no.spam.veggiechinese.net
Mon Jul 15 20:54:34 UTC 2002
In article <agvcfs$fm9u$1 at isrv4.isc.org>, Simon Waters wrote:
> Will Yardley wrote:
>> Why does dig +trace fail on this:
>> jazz% dig +trace ilove.lancaster.pa.us.
>> dig: couldn't get address for 'B.GTLD.BIZ': not found
> I can get BIND 9.2.1 to answer for b.gtld.biz from glue, and
> then if I query "dig gtld.biz ns" it caches the non-existence of
> "b". Your problem dig query still works with dig from 9.2.1,
> whichever way I do it.
d'oh - should have checked that. Works fine with 9.2.1 DiG:
bacall% dig +trace ilove.lancaster.pa.us.
; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> +trace ilove.lancaster.pa.us.
;; global options: printcmd
. 114050 IN NS E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 114050 IN NS F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 114050 IN NS G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 114050 IN NS H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 114050 IN NS I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 114050 IN NS J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 114050 IN NS K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 114050 IN NS L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 114050 IN NS M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 114050 IN NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 114050 IN NS B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 114050 IN NS C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 114050 IN NS D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
;; Received 292 bytes from 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) in 102 ms
us. 172800 IN NS A.GTLD.BIZ.
us. 172800 IN NS B.GTLD.BIZ.
us. 172800 IN NS C.GTLD.BIZ.
;; Received 143 bytes from 192.203.230.10#53(E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET) in 42
ms
lancaster.pa.us. 1000000 IN NS ns1.ptd.net.
lancaster.pa.us. 1000000 IN NS ns2.ptd.net.
;; Received 82 bytes from 209.173.53.162#53(A.GTLD.BIZ) in 104 ms
ilove.lancaster.pa.us. 86400 IN NS ns.newdream.net.
ilove.lancaster.pa.us. 86400 IN NS ns2.newdream.net.
;; Received 86 bytes from 204.186.0.201#53(ns1.ptd.net) in 111 ms
ilove.lancaster.pa.us. 7200 IN A 66.33.196.236
ilove.lancaster.pa.us. 7200 IN NS ns3.newdream.net.
ilove.lancaster.pa.us. 7200 IN NS ns.newdream.net.
ilove.lancaster.pa.us. 7200 IN NS ns2.newdream.net.
;; Received 168 bytes from 66.33.206.6#53(ns.newdream.net) in 32 ms
--
No copies, please.
To reply privately, simply reply; don't remove anything.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list