Secondary server not being used when primary is down ?
Simon Waters
Simon at wretched.demon.co.uk
Fri Jul 19 16:55:22 UTC 2002
Terry Paterson wrote:
>
> a whois query shows the following :
whois is nothing to do with DNS - honest.
Any resembalence between whois data and DNS data is purely
coincidental ;)
> Anyone got any tips for me ?
Okay one of the name servers is claiming that the name servers
are "actual-america.com".
Parent says
NS1.ACTUAL-AMERICA.com. 172800 IN A 12.42.65.180
NS0.actual-systems.com. 172800 IN A
212.67.201.196
12.42.65.180 says
ns0.actual-america.com. 86400 IN A 212.67.201.196
ns1.actual-america.com. 86400 IN A 12.42.65.180
212.67.201.196
ns0.actual-america.com. 86400 IN A 212.67.201.196
ns1.actual-america.com. 86400 IN A
12.42.65.180
So how is actual-america.com delegated...
parent says
NS1.actual-america.com. 172800 IN A 12.42.65.180
NS0.actual-america.com. 172800 IN A 212.67.201.197
Hold it - 197 for ns0 - are we sure on that? 12.42.65.180 just
said it was 196 and he is authoritative for the zone......
Querying for VERSION.BIND shows 212.67.201.196 is 8.2.2-p7 (ouch
that is fairly old - I'd replace it with 9.2.1).
Neither of the other servers is responding at the moment......
12.42.65.180 seems to be intermittent.
Switch off recursion on authoritative servers, read your CERT
announcements, practice safe hex.
Simon
More information about the bind-users
mailing list