Two BIND 9.2.1 questions
mdamrose at elgin.cc.il.us
Wed Jun 5 22:15:32 UTC 2002
I answered this *identical* post in comp.os.linux.networking 3 hours ago.
Please check back before bothering people in another forum.
"FEEB" <nospam at neverland.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:adlu8g$3p64$1 at isrv4.isc.org...
> I would appreciate any advice on the following:
> I upgraded to BIND 9.2.1 from RH errata RPM on my slave DNS server running
> RH7.2. I was running BIND 8.2.5 before the upgrade.
> Now, when I start named, it spawns 4 additional named's so that 5 named's
> are actually running. Is it normal? If not, why is it happening?
> I get lots of these in /var/log/messages:
> named: client 18.104.22.168#3492: query
> 'perfectly.valid.local.address/IN' denied,
> where "perfectly.valid.local.address" is an address of some local machine.
> The query looks legitimate to me. Why is it being rejected?
> Frank Bures, <grandial at pons dot cz>
More information about the bind-users