Two BIND 9.2.1 questions
Mark_Andrews at isc.org
Mark_Andrews at isc.org
Wed Jun 5 23:30:18 UTC 2002
>
> I would appreciate any advice on the following:
>
> 1.
> I upgraded to BIND 9.2.1 from RH errata RPM on my slave DNS server running
> RH7.2. I was running BIND 8.2.5 before the upgrade.
> Now, when I start named, it spawns 4 additional named's so that 5 named's
> are actually running. Is it normal? If not, why is it happening?
Did you read the FAQ? Is the FAQ included in the RPM?
Yes it's normal for a threaded application under Linux.
> 2.
> I get lots of these in /var/log/messages:
>
> named[24826]: client 198.22.121.119#3492: query
> 'perfectly.valid.local.address/IN' denied,
>
> where "perfectly.valid.local.address" is an address of some local machine.
> The query looks legitimate to me. Why is it being rejected?
Because you configured named to reject it.
> Thanks
>
>
> Frank Bures, <grandial at pons dot cz>
>
>
>
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews at isc.org
More information about the bind-users
mailing list