Error when configuring minimal-responses to yes in the named. conf
andris at hpl.hp.com
Fri Jun 14 18:51:38 UTC 2002
> Miguel Paramio <miguel.paramio at bt.es> wrote:
> Version of Bind is 9.1.2 and the line 16 is the config option
> minimal-responses yes
If you look at the CHANGES document on your other system where
BIND 9.2.x is installed, you'll see that the `mininal-responses'
option was added after 9.1.2 was released:
--- 9.2.0a1 released ---
779. [func] Added the "minimal-responses" option.
--- 9.1.0b2 released ---
You need to upgrade.
> "HURT, CHRIS [AG-Contractor/1000]" <chris.hurt at monsanto.com> wrote in message news:<aeb05h$ekh0$1 at isrv4.isc.org>...
> > Did you forget a semi-colon at the end of a line perhaps?
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu [mailto:phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:31 PM
> > To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at isc.org
> > Subject: Re: Error when configuring minimal-responses to yes in the
> > named.conf
> > Miguel Paramio <miguel.paramio at bt.es> wrote:
> > > I am configuring minimal-options in the named.conf and I am getting
> > > the following error when I do a rndc reload
> > > general: info: loading configuration from '/etc/named.conf'
> > > config: error: /etc/named.conf:16. parse error near
> > > 'minimal-responses'
> > > general: error: reloading configuration failed: failure
> > > Could anybody help me out ??
> > Whats on line 16 in '/etc/named.conf' ?=20
> > What version of bind are you using ?
> > > Thanks a lot
> > --=20
> > Peter H=E5kanson =20
> > IPSec Sverige ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
> > Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam =
> > out,
> > remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.
More information about the bind-users