Suggestion for FAQ improvement

Michael Kjorling michael at kjorling.com
Sat Mar 23 11:52:54 UTC 2002


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In the FAQ answer for the "CNAME and other data" problem
(http://dougbarton.net/bind-users/FAQ.html#CNAME-other), I believe
that it would not be inappropriate to mention that the DNSSEC record
types KEY, NXT and SIG are excluded from the "CNAME and other data"
rule.


Michael Kjörling

- -- 
Michael Kjörling  --  Programmer/Network administrator  ^..^
Internet: michael at kjorling.com -- FidoNet: 2:204/254.4   \/
PGP: 95f1 074d 336d f8f0 f297 6a5b 2aa3 7bfd 8a70 e33e

``And indeed people sometimes speak of man's "bestial" cruelty, but
this is very unfair and insulting to the beasts: a beast can never be
so cruel as a man, so ingeniously, so artistically cruel.''
(Ivan Karamazov, in Dostoyevsky's 'The Brothers Karamazov')
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key is at http://michael.kjorling.com/contact/pgp.html

iD8DBQE8nGydKqN7/Ypw4z4RAj59AKDrrI2pSHAAohKT70Mhhc+q4flO/gCdEOM+
WD7yN1YwBK3+b86sdTeFB1w=
=hilp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the bind-users mailing list