Conflicting results from different nameservers.
Robert Messinger
lists at mail.tiggee.com
Sun May 5 23:10:17 UTC 2002
What does stable glue record mean though?
When I'm querying the nameserver which is authoritive for
the record. The nameserver is accurate. It's the old
nameservers which are between my box and the authoritive
nameservers which are incorrect.
Please advise.
On 4 May 2002 phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu wrote:
>
> Robert Messinger <lists at mail.tiggee.com> wrote:
>
>
> > This might be a stupid question, but this problem really has
> > be confused. The namserver is returning the valid answer but
> > other namerservers seem to never update their values with the
> > appropriate record. They are keeping the old value. And this
> > problem has been going on for weeks now.
>
> > Here are the results. Any answer to this would be extremely
> > helpful.
>
> You seem to have a stale glue record for "www.thewomaninthechild.com."
>
> Ask your registrar to have it removed.
>
>
>
> > This is invalid, yet it never goes away! Once the TTL goes to 0
> > it just starts over again and it's wrong!
> > ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> > ;www.thewomaninthechild.com. IN A
>
> > ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> > www.thewomaninthechild.com. 42376 IN A 64.35.2.225
>
> > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> > thewomaninthechild.com. 42376 IN NS NS2.DNSMADEEASY.com.
> > thewomaninthechild.com. 42376 IN NS NS1.DNSMADEEASY.com.
>
> > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> > NS1.DNSMADEEASY.com. 10800 IN A 64.50.168.187
> > NS2.DNSMADEEASY.com. 10800 IN A 64.50.168.188
>
>
> > This is correct....
> > ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> > ;www.thewomaninthechild.com. IN A
>
> > ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> > www.thewomaninthechild.com. 500 IN CNAME thewomaninthechild.com.
> > thewomaninthechild.com. 60 IN A 209.251.15.206
>
> > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> > thewomaninthechild.com. 10800 IN NS ns1.dnsmadeeasy.com.
> > thewomaninthechild.com. 10800 IN NS ns2.dnsmadeeasy.com.
>
> > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> > ns1.dnsmadeeasy.com. 65189 IN A 64.50.168.187
> > ns2.dnsmadeeasy.com. 80505 IN A 64.50.168.188
>
> > Thanks for any help,
>
>
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list