BIND 9.2.1 and TCP

[Mark_Andrews at isc.org]

> It is disgusting because there are those who have too many routable =
> addresses and those who need some but are unable to get any, just like =
> the rich have more than enough money whereas I have little.
> 
> Anchi

	There is no shortage of routable addresses.  If your ISP
	won't supply them change to a ISP who will.  ISP and
	individuals can get them from the RIR's provided you can
	demonstrate you need them.  If your ISP won't supply you
	with them they are just being lazy.

	Mark
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cricket Liu [mailto:cricket at menandmice.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:35 PM
> To: bind-users at isc.org
> Subject: Re: BIND 9.2.1 and TCP
> 
> 
> 
> Kevin Darcy wrote:
> > Sorry, I shouldn't have assumed it was public.
> >=20
> > Still, it's somewhat disgusting to mix public and private addresses
> > like that, not to mention the sheer number of NS records in the
> > RRset. IMHO amd.com is in serious need of subzoning.=20
> 
> Why is mixing routable and RFC 1918 addresses disgusting?  At
> HP, we used both net 15 and RFC 1918 addresses internally.
> I'm sure lots of companies use a mix.
> 
> cricket
> 
> Men & Mice
> DNS Software, Training and Consulting
> www.menandmice.com
> 
> The DNS and BIND Cookbook, available now!
> http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/dnsbindckbk/
> 
> 
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews at isc.org