New version of Bind8 for W2k?

phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu
Sun Nov 17 09:55:37 UTC 2002


Jeffery Jones <jefferjones at altavista.net> wrote:

> On 16 Nov 2002 18:13:17 -0000, phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu wrote:

>>And what's your main objective with your nameservers: running 
>>a ms OS or running a working nameserver ? The answer of that 
>>question should steer your objectives.

>    The answer steers toward converting from Bind to MS DNS on Win 2000.    The last 2 major Bind exploits have not affected MS DNS.  If DNS is the only service exposed to the internet, the question of OS reliability is removed.  

There is more exploits/weaknesses that ms dns has but bind dont. So it's
not as simple as that.

>    Conclusion: For the most reliable and secure nameserver, switch to MS DNS on Win 2000.

At least will it achieve the most expensive dns.




-- 
Peter Håkanson         
        IPSec  Sverige      ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
           Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out,
	   remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.


More information about the bind-users mailing list