DNS propagation time
James Griffin
agriffin at cpcug.org
Sun Sep 1 13:26:26 UTC 2002
those who know me have no need of my name wrote:
>
> in comp.protocols.dns.bind i read:
>
> >May I make use of this opportunity to have mine tested instead
> >my domain is http://bps.lk
>
> no, your domain is `bps.lk'.
>
> >I am told that it is not yet up, but I should think that it is working.
> >It should take you to the web-page of 203.115.29.130 (metta.lk)
> >It is of-cause working within my network.
>
> it appears to be working. a quick check of a few large providers all
> provide the same answers.
>
'doc' reports an error.
Doc-2.2.3: doc -v bps.lk.
Doc-2.2.3: Starting test of bps.lk. parent is lk.
Doc-2.2.3: Test date - Sat Aug 31 16:18:55 EDT 2002
soa @ns.eu.net. for lk. has serial: 300372
soa @ns.nic.lk. for lk. has serial: 300372
soa @pendragon.cs.purdue.edu. for lk. has serial: 300372
SOA serial #'s agree for lk. domain
Found 2 NS and 0 glue records for bps.lk. @ns.eu.net. (non-AUTH)
Found 2 NS and 2 glue records for bps.lk. @ns.nic.lk. (non-AUTH)
Found 2 NS and 0 glue records for bps.lk. @pendragon.cs.purdue.edu.
(non-AUTH)
DNServers for lk.
=== 0 were also authoritatve for bps.lk.
=== 3 were non-authoritative for bps.lk.
Servers for lk. (not also authoritative for bps.lk.)
=== agree on NS records for bps.lk.
NS list summary for bps.lk. from parent (lk.) servers
== ns1.secondary.com. ns2.secondary.com.
soa @ns1.secondary.com. for bps.lk. serial: 2002092605
soa @ns2.secondary.com. for bps.lk. serial: 2002092605
SOA serial #'s agree for bps.lk.
Authoritative domain (bps.lk.) servers agree on NS for bps.lk.
ERROR: NS list from bps.lk. authoritative servers does not
=== match NS list from parent (lk.) servers
NS list summary for bps.lk. from authoritative servers
== dhamma.metta.lk. ns1.secondary.com. ns2.secondary.com.
Checking 0 potential addresses for hosts at bps.lk.
==
Summary:
ERRORS found for bps.lk. (count: 1)
Done testing bps.lk. Sat Aug 31 16:20:13 EDT 2002
Do you intend that dhamma.metta.lk. be a "hidden master"?
The SOA lists a MNAME which is not a name server and has bad email
address.
$ dig +short bps.lk. soa
bps.lk. root.dhamma.metta.lk. 2002092605 3600 900 1209600 43200
^MANME^ -----^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Not a domain either as an MX or A record
; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> dhamma.bps.lk. mx
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 1092
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;dhamma.bps.lk. IN MX
and
; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> dhamma.bps.lk.
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 39598
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;dhamma.bps.lk. IN A
There is no reverse zone.
$ dig +short bps.lk.
203.115.29.130
; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> -x 203.115.29.130
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 46094
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;130.29.115.203.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
29.115.203.in-addr.arpa. 10551 IN SOA ns1.slt.lk.
postmaster.slt.lk. 2000062600 10800 3600 864000 86400
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Jim
More information about the bind-users
mailing list